overnment has at least eight agency's to dispense aid to the poor...many of those agencies doing the same thing.
each agency has a staff, offices, supplies, vehicles and other expenses that have to be paid and the money goes to paying for those government workers and preparing to give out aid. this results in spending more preparing to give out aid than actually giving out aid to the poor. doesn't this provide jobs for those government workers that wouldn't otherwise have a job? what it does is take away more tax dollars from the private sector. the private sector makes things or provides a service that people want and pay for. the owner of that private sector business for example may spend $10 dollars to make a gadget to sell. they sell it to the person that wants it for $15 and makes a profit of $5. they are happy for having made $5 for each gadget they sell and the person that wanted and bought the gadget is happy.
the maker of the gadget does the same thing again and again. his gadgets are so popular that he needs help. he hires people. now, let's compare that to the government. the government takes money from gadget makers and service providers all over the country to hire government workers. those workers provide a service as well. they don't make and sell gadgets or provide services at a profit...they provide a service that makes no money. that service is then given away with the exception of some fee's that the government charges which with along with the money they take from gadget makers and service providers in the private sector, goes towards paying the bills for all the things the government needs to provide that service and then give it away.
there isn't enough money coming in from fees and there aren't enough gadget makers and service providers to take the money from to keep up with government spending. some say take more from the gadget makers and service providers. that will help, they say. they say this instead of saying let's make the government stop giving away more than we have to give. the gadget makers and service providers can't give more and then make more gadgets or provide more services if it's being taken away by the government to pay for government workers and the stuff they need to help give services away. the government doesn't produce anything. they don't make gadgets or provide services that make a profit where that profit can make more gadgets and provide more services that will require more jobs.
no, they take more and give more away. they spend more and hire more to help give more away. this can't go on and is why our nation is now borrowing money from the federal reserve and other country's because they have run out of people to take money from. now they are looking at the wealthy. in a nation of 315 million people, the percentage of wealthy is relatively small...if it was easy to become wealthy, everyone would be wealthy. it's much easier to remain middle-class or poor than it is to become wealthy, so there just aren't that many of them. yet, they have what the government needs and wants...money. so the government sets about to take more so they can give more away...but before they do, they need to hire more people who will need more stuff so they can more easily give more money away. once they've taken from the wealthy, the government then looks to the middle class to finance their jobs.
doesn't this sound like a racket? doesn't this sound like the people who we've elected, then hire more people? doesn't it sound like they write more laws that will help them give themselves more money so they can do a better job of giving more money away? it doesn't just sound that way, it is that way. as the government takes more from the gadget makers and service providers who make a profit and then hire people, it makes the gadget makers and service providers poorer and they can no longer hire as many if any at all. they can't meet the demand for those gadgets and services either.
when the government takes money from the wealthy to be able to give more to the poor and middle-class, the wealthy become poorer and can't even think about opening a business that makes gadgets or provides a service that will eventually hire people. eventually there are fewer and fewer jobs. fewer and fewer gadgets and services. the government has to look to then borrow more from the federal reserve and other countries to start giving that borrowed money away. eventually the wealthy start hiding their money or moving away to another friendlier country to keep what they made from selling gadgets or providing a service.
then when the government can no longer borrow money to maintain their own jobs and then give whatever is left over away...what will they do? they must create a war to put people back to work...but that too costs money that they will have to borrow. they must sell themselves to a smarter country as mercenaries, so that they can then reduce the numbers of people who get free stuff from them when they go off to war to die...but
the government workers who put them in this situation in the first place still have jobs. they don't go off to the war they create to have more money to give away. all of this just to keep a job when they instead could have gone to work making gadgets or providing a service instead? why would they...when they can just learn to lie about their intentions? it's much easier for them to do it that way. they've put you in bondage just to work for them while you're being kept on a chain. free your mind, vote for peace and prosperity; then let's get back to the constitution what our founders wrote to protect us...which our current leader's have chose to ignore.
each agency has a staff, offices, supplies, vehicles and other expenses that have to be paid and the money goes to paying for those government workers and preparing to give out aid. this results in spending more preparing to give out aid than actually giving out aid to the poor. doesn't this provide jobs for those government workers that wouldn't otherwise have a job? what it does is take away more tax dollars from the private sector. the private sector makes things or provides a service that people want and pay for. the owner of that private sector business for example may spend $10 dollars to make a gadget to sell. they sell it to the person that wants it for $15 and makes a profit of $5. they are happy for having made $5 for each gadget they sell and the person that wanted and bought the gadget is happy.
the maker of the gadget does the same thing again and again. his gadgets are so popular that he needs help. he hires people. now, let's compare that to the government. the government takes money from gadget makers and service providers all over the country to hire government workers. those workers provide a service as well. they don't make and sell gadgets or provide services at a profit...they provide a service that makes no money. that service is then given away with the exception of some fee's that the government charges which with along with the money they take from gadget makers and service providers in the private sector, goes towards paying the bills for all the things the government needs to provide that service and then give it away.
there isn't enough money coming in from fees and there aren't enough gadget makers and service providers to take the money from to keep up with government spending. some say take more from the gadget makers and service providers. that will help, they say. they say this instead of saying let's make the government stop giving away more than we have to give. the gadget makers and service providers can't give more and then make more gadgets or provide more services if it's being taken away by the government to pay for government workers and the stuff they need to help give services away. the government doesn't produce anything. they don't make gadgets or provide services that make a profit where that profit can make more gadgets and provide more services that will require more jobs.
no, they take more and give more away. they spend more and hire more to help give more away. this can't go on and is why our nation is now borrowing money from the federal reserve and other country's because they have run out of people to take money from. now they are looking at the wealthy. in a nation of 315 million people, the percentage of wealthy is relatively small...if it was easy to become wealthy, everyone would be wealthy. it's much easier to remain middle-class or poor than it is to become wealthy, so there just aren't that many of them. yet, they have what the government needs and wants...money. so the government sets about to take more so they can give more away...but before they do, they need to hire more people who will need more stuff so they can more easily give more money away. once they've taken from the wealthy, the government then looks to the middle class to finance their jobs.
doesn't this sound like a racket? doesn't this sound like the people who we've elected, then hire more people? doesn't it sound like they write more laws that will help them give themselves more money so they can do a better job of giving more money away? it doesn't just sound that way, it is that way. as the government takes more from the gadget makers and service providers who make a profit and then hire people, it makes the gadget makers and service providers poorer and they can no longer hire as many if any at all. they can't meet the demand for those gadgets and services either.
when the government takes money from the wealthy to be able to give more to the poor and middle-class, the wealthy become poorer and can't even think about opening a business that makes gadgets or provides a service that will eventually hire people. eventually there are fewer and fewer jobs. fewer and fewer gadgets and services. the government has to look to then borrow more from the federal reserve and other countries to start giving that borrowed money away. eventually the wealthy start hiding their money or moving away to another friendlier country to keep what they made from selling gadgets or providing a service.
then when the government can no longer borrow money to maintain their own jobs and then give whatever is left over away...what will they do? they must create a war to put people back to work...but that too costs money that they will have to borrow. they must sell themselves to a smarter country as mercenaries, so that they can then reduce the numbers of people who get free stuff from them when they go off to war to die...but
the government workers who put them in this situation in the first place still have jobs. they don't go off to the war they create to have more money to give away. all of this just to keep a job when they instead could have gone to work making gadgets or providing a service instead? why would they...when they can just learn to lie about their intentions? it's much easier for them to do it that way. they've put you in bondage just to work for them while you're being kept on a chain. free your mind, vote for peace and prosperity; then let's get back to the constitution what our founders wrote to protect us...which our current leader's have chose to ignore.
No comments:
Post a Comment