Saturday, October 6, 2012

Mitt Romney, Barrack Obama 3D Smack-Down. Hilarious...



you may never see this in real life, but you can see it here.  10 minute video of the mitt romney, barrack obama smack-down.  mitt romney does it with his fist instead of his smarts and wits in this classic rumble. :)

Thursday, October 4, 2012

why obamacare is hazardous to our health

obamacare is a 2,700 page law that was passed without democrats even reading it.  since republicans didn't have enough votes to block it in either the house or senate...it sailed through despite republican's objections.  romney was correct, obama did spend his first two years working on and passing obamacare while ignoring small businesses going under, and millions of people losing their jobs.  as they lost jobs...they lost houses, cars and self-respect.  all of this, just to pass a bill that democrats have salivated to get for 50+ years...government controlled healthcare.

it starts with obamacare and ends with a single-payer system which is a nice sounding way of saying only the government will be paying doctors and hospitals...not insurance companies.  the government will squeeze insurance companies until they go out of business.  it's already started.  the way insurance companies worked before is that they made a profit or they lost money based on good or bad decisions.  they made money on monthly premiums that people paid in.  if a person didn't get sick they collected the money as a hedge against those who did.  they employ actuary's who do statistics on the odds of a person getting sick or not.  then if they got it right, they made money.  if they got it wrong they lost money.

what do they do with profits.  well, some of that money goes to share holders.  a lot of shareholders are average folks who have a retirement fund at work...like a 401k.  other shareholders are private investors.  if the insurance company makes money...the folks make money.  the folks lose money if the insurance company makes the wrong decisions, but usually they get it right.  under pres. obama, insurance companies have to give their customer's a refund if they don't go to the doctor.  under obama, the insurance can pay its' bills and make a profit determined by the government.

any money left after that has to go back to people that have paid premiums but didn't go to the doctor.  with only making what the government says it can make in profits, the shareholders get hurt.  those people with 401k's make only as much as the government imposed limits on the insurance company's profit allows.  if there is no profit incentive in owning or investing in an insurance company...retirement fund manager's and private investors will get out of insurance and move into something more profitable...maybe not even in this country.

insurance companies aren't the only companies that will be getting squeezed by obamacare.  your employer will be another.  the extra cost incurred by insurance companies of having to cover children until they're 25 or pre-existing conditions will make it tougher for your company to help you pay a portion or all of your insurance as they do now.  there is a good chance they'll drop you and let you go into obamacare.  obamacare will have a panel of 15 appointed members who will decide how much the government is willing to spend on the millions of different medical problems that millions of people may have.

that means they may say...okay, there is 80% chance of occurrence within the population who may get breast cancer, but only a 5% chance for kidney failure.  then they may decide to not put as much or none at all on that kidney problemst.  if you're unlucky enough to have one of those ailments then you'll have to find a way to pay for it yourself, live with the ailment or die if that comes along.  obamacare won't cover it.  doctors won't have to take the fees offered by obamacare.  they may just take patients who can afford to pay for their services.

doctors may not want to take the fee that the government says it will pay for this or that and they won't.  therefore, there will be fewer doctors and if you need to see one under obamacare, you'll have to wait until you can get an appointment because of the doctor shortage. let me briefly explain how medicare 1 and 2 works and then medicaid because it all ties in together.  medicare provides healthcare to seniors for major medical.  things like nursing home care, surgeries etc.  part 2 covers 80% of doctors visits for seniors.  a senior can buy supplement insurance to cover the deductible.

it's often cheaper to not pay a monthly fee for the supplemental unless you go to the doctor often. seniors have had medicare taken out of their checks during their lifetime and it goes into a government pool to help take care of them when they're older.  president obama says he is going to save medicare $716 billion dollars by reducing doctor's fees and fraud...my guess most of it will come from reducing doctor's fees.  again, the doctors don't have to then accept medicare patients and many of them are now choosing not to.  this means fewer doctors are going to be there when you need one who accepts medicare.

the $716 billion dollar savings won't go back to seniors in the form of getting a rebate or discount.  it will go to obamacare to give free services to those who don't have it.  they too will be faced with fewer doctors and a panel of 15 who determines their fate. medicaid is a program that provides care not based on age but on ability to pay.  if you're low income the state pays for it.  under obamacare, the states were offered in increase in federal funding to those states for two years.  most states are deciding to opt out of the extra federal money for two years because it will cost more to cover the extra people after the second year and this would kill state budgets as they already struggle to balance their budgets, which they must do by law.

also with medicaid, if you have medicare, it will cover whatever medicare does not cover.  to sum it up, the democrats are trying to through obamacare, bankrupt the "evil profit centers" of insurance companies and take over the healthcare industry.  you will have no insurance companies competing for your business if they are successful...you will have the same government handling your healthcare that loses your mail, ignores your complaints and has rude and uncaring government employees.  why would you want that when we now have the best healthcare in the world that just needs to be tweaked...not taken over completely by the government.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

democrat's "big tent" is really just a circus freak show.


democrat's claim to be "the big tent party".  okay, let's see who's in their big tent.

muslim's
they booed when democrat leader's under pressure, put god back in the democratic party platform. meanwhile, obama let's the radical muslim's kill our ambassador's and burn down our embassies as they shout, "death to america."

labor unions.
remember jimy hoffa?) mobsters that pretend to look out for workers but really just collect fee's from members to give to the democratic party even if the member is a republican or libertarian.  the claim to fight for worker's right's.  an example of this is chicago where in a four year recession teacher's got a 16% raise and still went on strike because they didn't want job evaluations.  so poor performing teacher's just get shuffled around.  they still get to screw up someone's kid though.  what about the time they were striking and parents had to take off or get someone to watch their kids?

blacks/mexican's and other minorities.
democrat leader's lie to them and don't do anything for them because they know blacks and other minorities will vote for them anyway.  they can do anything to blacks and other minorities because they know blacks and other minorities aren't paying attention, won't research their background or learn who they are or what they stand for and will vote for them anyway...sad.

green party/code pink/communist party.
the green party loves the earth and hates people (except themselves because they don't count because they're the ones trying to help.  they want us back in caves or dead and not using up the earth's resources.  code pink..i don't know what they stand for but i do know that any woman that dresses up like a pink vagina and protests on the street in front of the democratic national convention while bill clinton is in town has some screws loose.  the communist party has been around forever...destroying nations and starving or shooting their citizen's in places like russia and china.  they have a branch here with hundreds of thousands of members and nuts, but are welcome in the democratic "big tent".

gays/atheist
i'm going to lump them together to.  we all know what gays are and don't care.  just keep it to yourselves, don't ask christians to accept gay marriage, you have civil unions and stop comparing gayness to the struggle black people had.  when you start getting lynched, killed and have your skin made into belts, lamp shades and other souvenirs, they we'll consider it.  atheist, you're just so smart.  you claim there is no proof of jesus.  where's the proof that your relatives who walked the earth when christ did?  at least we have artifacts of jesus life and written testimony of his miracles...you're the one that has no proof of your existence.

liberal progressives.
ivy league educated or ivy league wannabe's.  good jobs.  damn good jobs...you just want to take over the world that's all.  new world order, agenda 21, trying to take away our constitutional rights like the right to own guns, free speech and evenutally the right to vote.  you want everything controlled by the united nations and then when someone calls you on it...you laugh it off and say they're conspiracy theorist.  no they're not.  you just lie about it.  you are and there are youtube video's of your meetings where someone recorded you giving a speech at some university and those speeches are plastered all over the internet.  there are articles that you write to each other online because you think we're too stupid to find and read them...we're not.

that's the democrat's "big tent".  they want to make it sound warm and open to all.  it is...just not to normal people.  they've learned that normal people hang out at the republican's camp.  even though democrat's will lie and play on your weaknesses by saying republican's are racist, homophobic, islamophobic, sexist and don't care about the working class because they're all rich old white men, stupid and hateful republican women and uncle tom blacks.  what else can they say?  they want your votes and your money so they have to try to come up with stuff to scare you.

Monday, October 1, 2012

the reasons behind the obama administration's rush to regulate and expand government.

perception drives the stock market. perception drives the economy. perception drives real estate, interest rates, the price of food and gas. perception drives capitalism. perception drives our country because our country is based on capitalism and free market. there are free markets or there is a controlled market where there is "excessive" government control and regulations. 

let me give you several examples of what i mean by perception. let's start with a basic one that everyone uses...food and gas. if people think the price of food and gas will go up, they go buy more now while the price is cheap. that extra demand coming from others who think the same thing about food and gas prices going up and then purchasing...makes the prices go up.

this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. the same thing applies in the stock market. if people think a lot of variables are favorable for business growth and thus many company's shares will increase..people who buy those shares will jump into the market to make money. as more people think the market is going to go up and they buy more...as as they buy, those who sell will charge more for them. thus, the prices go up and people make more when it's their turn to sell.

that is self-fulling prophecy, perspective and free market capitalism at work. when the government steps in to regulate this (usually, they want to get their hands on some of the money, but end up mucking things up in the process) it slows down growth. that perception of growth turns to fear of the government stepping in and interfering with the buying and selling that's going on...and this is why obama has extended our recession.

he has put into place a very costly healthcare system that will cost businesses a lot extra in taxes. how much? no one is sure and that is another thing that stops businesses from growing...uncertainty. they don't want to spend a certain amount on growing and then be hit with taxes that makes them go negative. an individual may go negative from time to time, but if a company does...people get fired.

besides obamacare, businesses face the recession itself. although interest rates are at historic lows, they're thinking why should we borrow money if no customers are walking through the doors. no customers, no profit and no way to pay the loan back regardless of how low the interest rate is. that is the stupidity of obama and government regulators on display.

they are thinking that if they keep interest rates low, it will spur growth...wrong. they think that if they throw money at the problem it will spur growth...wrong. throwing money at it does not increase the confidence of businesses and consumers if they think the government is going to continue to make the wrong decisions.

finally, the perception of the country is down because the obama administration is making decisions to "excessively" regulate energy, banking, credit, real estate, the auto industry, travel and others. by implementing a major overhaul of our entire free market system businesses and consumers who know anything at all about business know that this is not normal.

this would not be normal for a small state to try to accomplish in four years. the obama administration has attempted to do it in four years in a nation the size and complexity of ours...without studying how by changing this, it affect growth and other factors. they didn't consider unintended consequences. businesses and consumers see the amateurishness of this administration and for those who know anything about business it scares them to death and they're perception right now is at an all time low.

businesses and consumers will continue to sit on their money because with this administration...who knows what tomorrow may bring and people are just not going to take any chances in losing even more money with them. as long as business' and consumer's perception is low...we will have a recession and president obama doesn't seem to get that because nowhere in any of his speeches is he saying, "i went too far, let me pull back". no, he's saying, "i didn't do enough...give me four more years, i need to do to do more." is that really what you want... four more years of nothing or even worse?

the type of government that president obama is creating is one that works best with a system of socialism or communism. it destroys the free market through excessive governmental regulations that cripple and eventually halt growth altogether as perceptions continue to plummet and fear of government intervention grows. this is why people who understand anything at all about business see the changes with great clarity that liberals in power are making and is the reason why they are calling this rush to regulate, an intentional move towards extreme socialism or full communism...it has nothing to do with his race.

it has to do with his upbringing and very close ties to communist who are close friends or mentors as he said in his autobiography. if it was his intention to move us away from capitalism and into communism, he should have been honest about this before his election and not lied about it, not win the election and then just do it. if voters then with the full understanding of what he planned on doing, wanted communism then communism it is, but he didn't do that. he won and then without telling us...did it without the consent of u.s citizens. if president obama wins, don't expect a brighter future coming from this administration...expect more of the same or worse.

darryl b. petitt has a degree in finance/economics and has owned a professional consulting company for 22 years, that specializes in commercial real estate consulting and valuation.

Demoralized as Hell: “I’ve been to the federal penitentiary, and I’m not going back for you” edition

click the link below for complete article.
Demoralized as Hell: “I’ve been to the federal penitentiary, and I’m not going back for you” edition: What if they should find a leader? What shall we do then. General Burgoyne The Devil’s Disciple 1959 Ulrich’s discovery of guts is cause for organization wide concern Daredevil Comics Born Again 1986 As we get closer and closer to election day (or should I say the day when the votes are counted since early [...]

What’s behind Obama’s curious timing of Gitmo jihadist Omar Khadr’s release

What’s behind Obama’s curious timing of Gitmo jihadist Omar Khadr’s release:


This is a murderous Islamic soldier, not a “child”
If I read one more description of Gitmo jihadist Omar Khadr as a former “child soldier,” I will throw up. As some of you may have read over the weekend, the 26-year-old Muslim killer who pleaded guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty to five charges related to the battlefield killing of U.S. soldier Christopher Speer was released from Gitmo by the White House on Saturday and sent back to Canada.
Khadr was captured during a 2002 bloody firefight at a suspected al Qaeda compound near Khost, Afghanistan.
Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald/McClatchy broke the story this weekend of his repatriation:
Khadr departed the base in Cuba before dawn Saturday, a secret transfer 10 days after a Canadian diplomat paid Khadr a visit on his 26th birthday. He landed at a Royal Canadian airbase in Ontario and was transferred to the Millhaven maximum security prison for what his lawyer described as an assessment of the most suitable place to serve out his sentence.
The case of Khadr — Guantánamo’s last Western captive — stirred debate in international law and human rights circles.
Because he was captured at such a young age, some called him a child soldier who was dropped off in the war zone by his father and deserving of rehabilitation not interrogation. Others called him the respected scion of an al Qaida family, nicknamed Canada’s First Family of Terror in news reports, and opposed his repatriation.
Psychiatrist Michael Welner, testifying at the Guantánamo war court for the prosecution and paid by the Pentagon, called Khadr a continuing danger who spent his time at the U.S. prison camps in Cuba “marinating in a community of hardened and belligerent radical Islamists.”
I have followed Khadr’s case and his sob-story lawyers since 2003 (archive of Khadr posts here and columns here and here.)
Background I reported in 2003 about the Khadr family, led by a senior al Qaeda member who was killed in 2003 in a battle with Pakistani forces:
Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien is vacationing in the Dominican Republic this weekend, where he will tee off with former U.S. President Bill Clinton for the newly inaugurated Soft-on-Terror Masters Tournament.
While Chretien golfs, his fellow countryman and favorite accused terrorist Ahmad Said Khadr is still on the loose.
Khadr, an Egyptian-born Canadian citizen, is considered by intelligence officials to be the highest-ranking Canadian within Osama bin Laden’s inner circle. He studied computer science at the University of Ottawa and worked for an Ottawa-based Islamic charity, Human Concern International, which was generously subsidized by Chretien’s government.
Khadr is suspected of siphoning charity funds to bin Laden and other jihadists, and of serving as a chief terrorist recruiter. Known as “al-Kanadi” (Arabic for “The Canadian”), Khadr had previously been in custody in Pakistan for the 1995 bombing of the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad that killed 17 people.
As I’ve noted before (and it is especially worth repeating in light of attempts by some high-ranking American diplomats to make amends with Canada), our so-called friend and supposed War on Terror partner Chretien was instrumental in securing Khadr’s freedom.
Chretien personally intervened on behalf of Khadr during a 1996 state visit to Pakistan. He aggressively sought guarantees from Benazir Bhutto, then the country’s prime minister, that Khadr would receive due process and fair treatment. The suspected Egyptian Islamic Jihad terrorist was released shortly after Chretien’s diplomatic lobbying campaign.
The United Nations, U.S. and Canada (last, of course) have since frozen the fugitive Khadr’s assets due to his suspected ties to bin Laden. One of his sons, an al-Qaida operative and former terror training camp commander, is on the run with Khadr.
Another of Khadr’s sons, 16-year-old Omar, is in U.S. custody at Guantanamo Bay for his alleged role in an ambush of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan last summer. Omar is accused of lobbing the hand grenade that killed Sergeant First Class Christopher Speer, a 28-year-old medic with the U.S. Special Forces.
“That wasn’t a panicky teen-ager we encountered that day,” Sergeant First Class Layne Morris of South Jordan, Utah, who lost his right eye in the ambush, told the Boston Globe last month. “That was a trained al-Qaida who wanted to make his last act on earth the killing of an American.”
Speer left behind a wife and two children, ages 3 and 11 months. Just days before his murder, Speer had selflessly walked into a minefield to rescue two wounded Afghan children.
Two words: WHY NOW? And what’s really behind Khadr’s release? Will the dhimmi lapdog media dare to ask?
Reuters suggests that the repatriation was promoted by “U.S. anger” over leaked video of Khadr’s interrogation. The Obama administration is accusing the conservative Canadian government of the breach. But the Toronto Star has reported just the opposite:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office denied any knowledge of the source of the leak.
“We have no comment on the accuracy or inaccuracy of the Maclean’s article and do not know what sources the magazine relied on,” said Harper spokesman Andrew MacDougall.
“Access to the interview video is strictly controlled within the government of Canada,” he added.
The PMO would not say whether the government would undertake an investigation into the leak. The office of Public Safety Minister Vic Toews did not respond to the Star’s queries.
But Welner, the psychiatrist who conducted the interview, suggested the fault lies with Khadr’s legal defence team, if not with the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama.
In an emailed statement to the Star, Welner said he has not disclosed the transcript.
He claims the Maclean’s story is a “distortion” of the transcript.
“I am sure that were anyone interested in an accurate understanding of the interview, the interview itself would be released to the public to form its own impression,” he wrote.
Khadr’s Pentagon-appointed lawyer Army Lt.-Col. Jon Jackson said “No member of the defence team released the tape or transcript.”
“None of us have or ever would release classified information.”
According to Maclean’s, and the excerpts it published, Khadr may be a victim of torture as he has sworn to, but also appears as the “unrepentant and unconvincing” man that Welner characterized at trial.
Please note, dear readers, that the Center for Constitutional Rights (to which White House visitor and Muslim Brotherhood community organizer Hisham Altalib donated a huge chunk of change) has been at the forefront of pressing for Khadr’s release.
I also remind you, dear readers, that CCR also crusaded for the release of Gitmo jihadist Abu Sufian bin Qumu — now the lead suspect in the bloody attack on our consulate in Benghazi.
And I remind you that this appeasement-addicted administration is reportedly weighing the release of the Blind Sheik, while clinging to the blame-the-video shield against accountability for the mess in Libya.
So: Why now?

What is the Cost to American Families, of Aid to Islamist Nations?

What is the Cost to American Families, of Aid to Islamist Nations?:
by Ronald Solomon, @OhSuzyQz, & Arlen Williams



  This article includes a few videos and here is one to start us off,

for those who like a little music with their reading,
What’s that at the end, about respecting people’s private property?

 

What is the cost of subsidizing Islamic countries that hate us?

The average median income for a family of four in the United States is $51,000.00. Such a family will pay $2,900.00 in federal income taxes, that much personal property confiscated by the iron fist of government power and spent as its officials choose. Based on this example, let’s look and see how many American families’ taxes it takes for the Obama Administration to give annual aid to Islamic countries that hate us.
Egypt

Annual aid: $1.56 billion
The new president of Egypt is the leader of a terrorist organization. His regime has stood by while Christians in Egypt have been murdered and churches burned. He did nothing when our embassy in Cairo was attacked. He has not even issued an apology for the attack.
Egypt votes against the United States in the United Nations 79% of the time.
It takes 573,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Pakistan

Annual aid: $6.7 billion
This country hid Bin Laden, imprisoned the doctor for 30 years who helped the U.S. find Bin Laden, and continues to harbor Al Qaeda terrorists within its borders.
Pakistan votes against the United States in the United Nations 75% of the time.
It takes 2,300,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Palestinian Authority (West Bank and Gaza Strip)

Annual aid: $600 million
The Palestinians danced in the streets when the World Trade Center collapsed on 9/11. Just lately, for the last three days they have been rioting in the streets, yelling: “Death to all Americans.”



Video at YouTube.com

It takes 206,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Afghanistan

Annual aid: $1.9 billion
On top of our training of the Afghan military, we give Afghanistan $1.9 billion in aid annually and Obama entered into an agreement with Afghanistan promising billions more.
In the last few days, Afghan protestors rioted in the streets in reaction to the U.S. Embassy attacks, yelling, “Death to Americans”, attacked two U.S. bases killing several people and burned an effigy of President Obama. Our troops are being murdered by the Afghan military which we are training, while we train them.
It takes 655,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Nigeria

Annual aid: $600 million
In Nigeria, Christians are routinely murdered and churches burned.
It takes 206,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Sudan

Annual aid: $500 million
Just a few days ago, rioters in Khartoum attacked and broke into the German embassy, surrounded the British embassy and marched on the U.S. embassy.
Sudan votes against the United States in the United Nations 75% of the time.
It takes 172,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
Somalia

Annual aid: $35 million
Yes, we actually give foreign aid to the country that gives safe harbor to pirates that murder innocent people on the high seas.
It takes 12,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this country.
In addition to these countries, the United States sent billions of tax payer money to the following Islamic counties, all of which vote overwhelmingly against the United States in the United Nations:
  • Algeria
  • Bangladesh
  • Chad
  • Iraq
  • Indonesia
  • Jordan
  • Lebanon
  • Libya
  • Morocco
  • Mali
  • Mauritania
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Oman
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uzbekistan
  • Yemen
And what was the reaction from the heads of state of each of these countries to the murder of our Ambassador in Libya and the attacks on our embassies worldwide?
With the exception of the president of Libya, not one word.
To add to all this, Hillary Clinton requested and received an additional $750 million in aid for Muslim countries to help them through a transition period from the Arab Spring.
It takes 258,000 U.S. families to pay for the “aid” to this cause.
In 2009, President Obama in his speech in Cairo spoke of “a new beginning,” and “America is not — and never will be — at war with Islam.” No, Mr. President, it would appear that Islam is at war with America and the U.S. tax payers are paying for the war.
For the reader that can only remember these words, “the Muslim Brotherhood is good. We want them in Egypt….” may I point out this video by Mohammad Mursi, the new President of Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood. In the name of Allah and Martyrdom, he promised their followers that Jerusalem would be capital of a new Islamic Caliphate.



Video at YouTube

To pander to these fanatics, the Democratic Party Platform did not originally refer to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Then, of course, there was the so called 2/3 vote at the Democratic National Convention to restore the language that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, that did not actually pass, but an embarrassed Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigossa said it had.



Video at YouTube

Who are the real fanatics that are trying to destroy America, the Muslim’s or the Democrats?
These figures change from year to year. We could add the cost of all of our Citizens’ involuntary, government-confiscated contributions to America-hating Jihadists last year, or this year, or those planned for 2013 and onward. But does that answer the question that started us off? Let us add one word to it, in parentheses:

What is the (true) cost of subsidizing Islamic countries that hate us?

How many families pay?





Video at YouTube

In the future, historians of this land will write of the foolish Americans of the early Twenty-First Century, who thought the terrorism they experienced was the result of poverty native to the terrorists. They will also note the appeasers, who as voluntary victims of racketeers, thought they were investing in these nations as a subscription to their safety.
We hope these historians will be dismayed survivors in an America which had learned otherwise in time, instead of gleeful jihadis in the northwest corner of their Caliphate – or the Illuminist elite of Agenda 21, who would have used them as chess pieces, prior to victimizing them in turn, by whatever engineered genocide.

Addendum



Video, “Rand Paul: ‘Not One Penny More for Libya, Egypt or Pakistan

Until They Act Like Our Allies‘”

His moral, rational stance was overwhelmingly rejected in the Senate, 9/22.

For further information about this travesty see:

Infiltration, Treason, Jihad – Welcome to The Project

Infiltration, Treason, Jihad – Welcome to The Project:
NoisyRoom


The Blaze aired a special last week in two parts called The Project. Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here.
As I have contended from the very beginning, Obama and his minions are corrupt beyond belief. It is my belief that Obama is actively facilitating the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islam in an effort to bring America to her knees and usher in not only Sharia law, but a worldwide caliphate. This week, I am going to summarize for you the content of The Project and what it means to Americans. Time is growing short, we are entering the third and final phase of a very, very evil plan.
In 2001, an Islamic manifesto called The Project was discovered in Switzerland. This document is a plan to carry out a quiet coup within the United States through indoctrination, subversion and infiltration at all levels of our government and through key positions in education and other influential positions such as the media. Fast forward to 2008 and the Holyland Foundation Trial. This showcased the largest terror financing trial in US history. There are 80 boxes of evidence, including The Project, that have been made available by our government to the accused enemies of America, but which, to this day, are being withheld from our leaders and the American people. Barack Obama, Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano cite national security, but have given the terrorists a free pass to review the documents. I contend, that if they haven’t already done so, that Obama and his colleagues will destroy those documents because they implicate Obama and his administration in outright treason by aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood. If Obama loses this election, he will most likely do two things: 1) He will release the Blind Sheik and 2) he will have those 80 boxes of documents destroyed if he hasn’t done so already. Obama will remain faithful to his Muslim roots and his anti-colonialist leanings. Remember Obama’s words:
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.


Radical Islamists have waged a silent propaganda and indoctrination war here in the US for many years and they have been winning over the hearts, minds and souls of many. They now are trying to basically do away with our First Amendment rights by criminalizing any form of speech that is deemed offensive to Islam. They have put themselves in place in our government and managed to purge all government documentation and libraries of any reference that criticizes Islam or that they find objectionable – i.e. blasphemy. They have even gotten into school textbooks glorifying Islam and rewriting our history in their favor. Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Islamic gang, are working towards United Nations Resolution 16/18 which prohibits “discrimination based on religion or belief.” That is an anti-blasphemy resolution and if passed by our senate, the end of the First Amendment.
From Diana West:
Here’s the secret that blasphemy laws are written to smother: Regarding the fundamentals of freedom of conscience, the autonomy of the individual, protection of children and equality of women, Islamic and Western doctrines have nothing in common and are, in fact, at irreconcilable, dagger’s-point odds. Silence – Shariah blasphemy laws – is the Obama-Clinton-OIC Islamic answer. Indeed, in the Shariah-compliant end, silence will replace the questions, too.
But we’re already used to it. Don’t believe me? Afshin Ellian, an Iranian-born Dutch law professor, poet and columnist, puts it this way: “If you cannot say that Islam is a backward religion and that Muhammad is a criminal, then you are living in an Islamic country, my friend, because there you also cannot say such things. I may say Christ was a homosexual and Mary was a prostitute, but apparently I should stay off of Muhammad.”
Obama has thrown the doors of our hallowed halls open to the Muslim Brotherhood. He meets with them every chance he gets, while snubbing Netanyahu and Israel – buying time for Iran to wipe them from the face of the earth with a nuke or 12. Our elected officials demanded a halt to the 1 billion slated for Egypt and funding for Libya after our embassies and consulates were attacked and an ambassador and others were murdered. Even after this horrendous event, where Obama, Rice and Clinton all lied about the cause of the terrorism, Obama turned around and is attempting to give $450 million to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and another $50+ million to Syrian rebels. So far, a few brave individuals in the House and Senate have stopped this, but I expect Obama to circumvent their efforts and send the money to our enemies anyway. It’s for his homies, don’t ya know.
The infiltration into America is on a par with Communism’s and in fact, they have linked forces to overthrow us from within. The Progressives and the Jihadists are working together to transform America. Each believes that in the end they will win and then get rid of the other. But that is after they have destroyed our Constitutional Republic. This is a war we could lose without ever being attacked – ravaged by the enemies within.
From The Blaze, here is a section of The Project:
This report presents a global vision of a worldwide strategy for Islamic policy [or "political Islam"]. Local Islamic policies will be drawn up in the different regions in accordance with its guidelines. It acts, first of all, to define the points of departure of that policy, then to set up the components and the most important procedures linked to each point of departure; finally we suggest several missions, by way of example only, may Allah protect us.
The following are the principal points of departure of this policy:
Point of Departure 1: To know the terrain and adopt a scientific methodology for its planning and execution.
Point of Departure 2: To demonstrate proof of the serious nature of the work.
Point of Departure 3: To reconcile international engagement with flexibility at a local level.
Point of Departure 4: To reconcile political engagement and the necessity of avoiding isolation on one hand, with permanent education and institutional action on the other.
Point of Departure 5: To be used to establish an Islamic State; parallel, progressive efforts targeted at controlling the local centers of power through institutional action.
Point of Departure 6: To work with loyalty alongside Islamic groups and institutions in multiple areas to agree on common ground, in order to “cooperate on the points of agreement and set aside the points of disagreement”.
Point of Departure 7: To accept the principle of temporary cooperation between Islamic movements and nationalist movements in the broad sphere and on common ground such as the struggle against colonialism, preaching and the Jewish state, without however having to form alliances. This will require, on the other hand, limited contacts between certain leaders, on a case by case basis, as long as these contacts do not violate the [shari’a] law. Nevertheless, one must not give them allegiance or take them into confidence, bearing in mind that the Islamic movement must be the origin of the initiatives and orientations taken.
Point of Departure 8: To master the art of the possible on a temporary basis without abusing the basic principles, bearing in mind that Allah’s teachings always apply. One must order the suitable and forbid that which is not, always providing a documented opinion. But we should not look for confrontation with our adversaries, at the local or the global scale, which would be disproportionate and could lead to attacks against the dawa or its disciples.
Point of Departure 9: To construct a permanent force of the Islamic dawa and support movements engaged in jihad across the Muslim world, to varying degrees and insofar as possible.
Point of Departure 10: To use diverse and varied surveillance systems, in several places, to gather information and adopt a single effective warning system serving the worldwide Islamic movement. In fact, surveillance, policy decisions and effective communications complement each other.
Point of Departure 11: To adopt the Palestinian cause as part of a worldwide Islamic plan, with the policy plan and by means of jihad, since it acts as the keystone of the renaissance of the Arab world today.
Point of Departure 12: To know how to turn to self-criticism and permanent evaluation of worldwide Islamic policy and its objectives, of its content and its procedures, in order to improve it. This is a duty and a necessity according to the precepts of shari’a.
President Obama has been practicing the art of Taqiyya, lying to the infidels as permitted by Sharia law, since he came into office. Those of us who have been exposing this and decrying Obama’s Islamic moves are branded “Islamophobes” (a term invented by the Muslim Brotherhood). Those that made The Blaze documentary are incredibly brave and dedicated souls. Some of them have lost their jobs, their careers and have risked imprisonment or death to expose this. Other brave warriors such as Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer fight every day to expose what is really going on… the savagery and hate that radical Islam incorporates and the efforts to tax, kill or convert infidels through the religion of peace. From The Blaze:
Calling on experts like Stephen Coughlin, Andrew McCarthy and Rep. Michele Bachmann to name a few, The Project provides key insights into why Americans are currently witnessing an increase in political correctness where Islam is concerned, a U.S. “policy of appeasement” in the face of terrorist acts, and how members of the current administration are warming to a host of Muslim Brotherhood affiliates.
This documentary is literally life and death for the US. There are three phases of the movement:
  • Befriend the infidel.
  • Attain positions of power and influence.
  • Utilize violent jihad to obtain control.
I believe we are close to entering the third and final stage in America. The OIC (the Organization of the Islamic Conference) and the Muslim Brotherhood have grown massively powerful in the US and around the globe. The OIC comprises 56 Islamic states and they have formed for all basic purposes a caliphate. The OIC is Hamas, Hezbollah, al Qaeda and other militant sects.
Ask yourself, what is your government hiding in those 80 boxes? I believe that if the contents were exposed, it would be the end of Obama and his cohorts. Jail time all around. It would end the infiltration, treason and jihad. The world is on fire from radical Islamists and evil. The US is the Great Satan and we are at war.


Welcome to The Project.






The Project